Interested in a future career as a lawyer? Use The Beginner’s Guide to a Career in Law to get started
Find out about the various legal apprenticeships on offer and browse vacancies with The Law Apprenticeships Guide
Information on qualifying through the Solicitors Qualifying Exam, including preparation courses, study resources, QWE and more
Discover everything you need to know about developing your knowledge of the business world and its impact on the law
The latest news and updates on the actions being taken to improve diversity and inclusion in the legal profession
Discover advice to help you prepare for and ace your vacation scheme, training contract and pupillage applications
Your first-year guide to a career in law – find out how to kickstart your legal career at this early stage
Your non-law guide to a career in law – everything you need to know about converting to law
updated on 05 April 2019
The Legal Aid Agency has been criticised for adding to funding problems which have created “advice deserts” around the UK by setting a maximum £35 case fee for immigration telephone advisers.
The agency is considering bids to provide telephone immigration advice to detainees in police custody. The Law Gazette reports that the fee was described as “ridiculously low” by the director of the Law Centres Network, Julie Bishop. She said: “One has to ask how much time or effort the Ministry of Justice anticipates could therefore be spent on each call and therefore what is the intention of the service? It clearly reflects the Ministry of Justice’s disregard for those who might wish to use the service.”
Jawaid Luqmani, partner at specialist immigration firm Luqmani Thompson & Partners, warned that the Legal Aid Agency is taking a short-sighted approach by tendering to the lowest bidder. He said: “The fact that the Legal Aid Agency believes that it is possible to run a tender at this price reflects the fact that it is confident and probably justifiably confident that there will be some suppliers content to proceed on this basis. Will it mean more individuals potentially get some form of advice? Yes. Will it mean more people get effective access to real justice? Possibly not.”