Pupillage Gateway’s user guide continues to enforce ban on AI use for pupillage applications

Reading time: one minute

A sample application in the Pupillage Gateway’s 2024 Applicant User Guide highlights that aspiring barristers seeking pupillage in the current application cycle must still confirm that they haven’t used any AI tools in their responses.

A notice at the conclusion of each application, located in the ‘Application Summary and Agreements’ section, requests that applicants confirm that their application is their “sole creation and original work”. In addition, the section also states that “any application which has been written with the use of any generative AI LLMs like ChatGPT or any similar programme will be excluded from the shortlisting process of the relevant Authorised Education and Training Organisation”.

This approach differs to that of a few solicitors’ firms that have released guidance on the use of AI in applications. For instance, the newly merged megafirm A&O Shearman provides guidance on how AI can enhance candidate applications. The law firm views AI as a "highly effective resource" for improving clarity and conciseness but advises against relying on technology as a substitute “for your voice and capabilities”.

In a similar vein, Shoosmiths encourages applicants to use AI to refine and develop their original ideas, while emphasising the importance of personal integrity and honesty – “fundamental attributes that cannot be replaced by technology”. While both firms make it clear that AI shouldn’t be used in place of the individual making the application, it seems there’s scope for candidates to use the technology to “compliment” their skills.

Find out more about using AI in law firm applications. Plus, check out our masterclass with Shoosmiths on AI in the legal profession.