Interested in a future career as a lawyer? Use The Beginner’s Guide to a Career in Law to get started
Find out about the various legal apprenticeships on offer and browse vacancies with The Law Apprenticeships Guide
Information on qualifying through the Solicitors Qualifying Exam, including preparation courses, study resources, QWE and more
Discover everything you need to know about developing your knowledge of the business world and its impact on the law
The latest news and updates on the actions being taken to improve diversity and inclusion in the legal profession
Discover advice to help you prepare for and ace your vacation scheme, training contract and pupillage applications
Your first-year guide to a career in law – find out how to kickstart your legal career at this early stage
Your non-law guide to a career in law – everything you need to know about converting to law
updated on 17 March 2014
The Legal Services Board (LSB) has published statutory guidance following the Legal Education and Training Review (LETR), urging regulators to increase flexibility in education and training.
In its guidance, the LSB said that regulators should not limit the number of people entering the profession and that providers should enjoy flexibility in delivering training and education. It also recommends that no particular route into the profession should be prescribed by regulators as "the gold standard". As reported by Legal Futures, the super-regulator has not indicated a timetable for reform, but it has explicitly stated that it will "take necessary action if regulators do not deliver". Chairman of the LSB, David Edmonds, said: "Today's statutory guidance is designed to be a catalyst for modernisation of the regulatory framework for education and training. We look to the frontline regulators to implement that guidance in ways that add flexibility to regulation."
Regulators, including the Law Society and the Bar Standards Board (BSB), have accused the LSB of overstepping its remit by issuing statutory guidance. Simon Thornton-Wood, head of education and training at the BSB, commented: "As we made clear in our response to the consultation, we believe that the LSB is exceeding its powers by issuing statutory guidance; and it is not necessary, in our view, to do this…We believe that frontline regulators are best placed to formulate their own approach, tailored to the needs of their respective profession." Earlier in the year, the City of London Law Society concluded that LSB training proposals were "deeply flawed".