Interested in a future career as a lawyer? Use The Beginner’s Guide to a Career in Law to get started
Find out about the various legal apprenticeships on offer and browse vacancies with The Law Apprenticeships Guide
Information on qualifying through the Solicitors Qualifying Exam, including preparation courses, study resources, QWE and more
Discover everything you need to know about developing your knowledge of the business world and its impact on the law
The latest news and updates on the actions being taken to improve diversity and inclusion in the legal profession
Discover advice to help you prepare for and ace your vacation scheme, training contract and pupillage applications
Your first-year guide to a career in law – find out how to kickstart your legal career at this early stage
Your non-law guide to a career in law – everything you need to know about converting to law
updated on 24 July 2015
The government's exceptional funding scheme for people who have been denied legal aid because of cuts has been ruled unlawful by the High Court.
As The Law Society Gazette reports, the merit test was ruled "wholly unsatisfactory", while the application process was damned as “far too complex” for applicants who are members of the public and not trained lawyers. The ruling was brought about when Charity Public Law Project challenged the scheme on behalf of a vulnerable client, 'IS'.
Mr Justice Collins, presiding over the case, found that the government's exceptional funding scheme is not providing the safety net it promises. The scheme is supposed to provide funding for cases which fall outside the current scope of legal aid, where not to provide funding would be a breach of the Human Rights Act. However, only 13% of applications to the scheme are successful (probably due to the defective merit test and application process) and there is no right of appeal - meaning that many people’s human rights are being breached because they cannot take their cases to courts or tribunals. Collins said it was "difficult to imagine" a family case involving children which would not qualify for funding under the Human Rights Act.
Collins said: "I believe that only in rare cases, subject to means and merits if properly applied, should legal aid be denied in such cases. As it is now applied the scheme is clearly wholly deficient in that it does not enable the family courts to be satisfied that they can do justice and give a fair hearing to an unrepresented party."
The Ministry of Justice has said that it will appeal the decision.